Destruction Knowledge Base
Destruction? I have been having dreams that involve destruction lately. One started out with me being a killer, and having a strange vault in my apartment with dead, alien-like bodies, and I was having a difficulty coping with who I was. Another dream I had last night involved some force that was destructing my town. The sun started to set very low and very fast at 4pm then a huge tital wave hit and people tried to climb very tall trees to get away and hope to stay alive. Some people would die because the trees would turn into pumpkins. But I always live when I have these sort of dreams. There always seems to be an end. I don't know why. Can anyone explain their interpretation?
What would be considered the smallest weapon of mass destruction? New York has arrested 4 guys with intent to use anti aircraft weapons which they are calling "weapons of mass destruction". What determines a weapon of mass destruction? What is mass destruction? Wouldn't a fuel tank truck be considered a WMD? So what you are saying is anything can be a WMD? So why isn't the US going after all of the WMDs instead of just the areas that have lots of oil?
Why was the destruction of Herculaneum and Pompeii a benifit to us? Why was the destruction of Herculaneum and Pompeii a benifit to us? My history teacher keeps asking that. I think i should know the answer soon just incase he picks on me. i just dont understand why its benificial.. didnt the eruption of mt. vesuvius occur around 79AD? plz help!
What are the chances of getting a rare lightsworn card from a light of destruction pack? What are the chances of getting a rare, super rare, ultra rare, or secret rare lightsworn card from a light of destruction. Im wondering if I should get a light of destruction booster box or just buy the cards sepratley on ebay. What would cost the most? And about how many rare (and above) lightsworn cards would I get from one light of destruction booster box.
What do you think of the idea of mutually assured destruction? I am writing an Ethics paper on the subject of mutually assured destruction. The idea is that when two countries have a critical mass of nuclear weapons aimed at each other, neither will attack because the threat of retaliation is too menacing. If peace can be attained through these means, is it worth it? I have my own opinions but I'd love to hear some more. Thanks.
How bad would the destruction of all birds be? I know it would tremendously hurt the ecosystem, but it would get rid of any risk of an avian influenza. Can somebody show me an article or some research that would show exactly how much a destruction of a species hurts the environment?
What do you believe will eventually save the world from evil and destruction? Every religion speaks of a "day of judgement" or similar scenarios. What do you think will save the world from future destruction? Explain a little if you can! I am overwhelmed with the deepness and insight of a lot of your answers.I chose K* cause I agree almost totally. Glw:I'm glad you have found your "Saviour" in GWB.You are unique! Soubassakis:The Greeks!How interesting!But I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one..I'd say the Irish!Read "How the Irish Saved Civilization" by Thomas Cahill! Stumped:Jesus?By God,I hope so. Marilyn:The Book of Revelation.I would love to be able to think your answer as perfect.But I'm in a crisis of faith at the moment...for the past year actually! Geshko:Yes,we are! Rfamilymember:You are very well educated in the common truth.Thanks for your optimistic call. Elopez1229:Noah REBORN!Nudge me when I should start blowing my rubber dingy! Diogenese19348:Weird,maybe.But alive? Deffo.Love the dpt beneath the humour.Your minor note was informative too. NobleScarlet: I think you do. Theanswerguy:Self-belief may be the strongest beilef,but only by learning from others do we establish self-belief.
What is the point of the United States having nuclear weapons of mass destruction? I can see the use for smaller, tactical nukes whose purpose is to strike a military target, and does not decimate civilian populations or endanger the planet to any great extent. I do not see the use for having a very large "total annihilation" nuclear weapons system. What is the point? Are we trying to frighten everyone in the world? Doesn't that just make them want to build nukes of their own? This isn't the cold war, Mutually assured destruction doesn't work with terrorist states, they want to die. Meanwhile, we are just scaring people with these things. What were we going to do with them? Nuke enemy cities, where the civilian populace is not a threat to us? So what about China and the European Union, are we afraid of these people, so much so that we must be prepared to obliterate them? I say it's completely nuts. And I am a conservative "hawk" who is pro-strong defense and border security. I would ask for total worldwide WMD disarmament, starting with nukes and pathogens and chemical agents. I would encourage beefy border security, offer aid to our allies, support UN troops for peacekeeping, and build strong missile defense systems in our nation and encourage our allies to do the same. Conventional weapons will do for peacekeeping and thwarting terrorism. And disarming these things which I would hope we have no intention to use should be a priority, and it would encourage other nations to disarm as well. I'm not a pacifist when it comes to defense. I believe in strong defense, and some offensive capability where needed. But WMD is something we should NEVER use. What if China were able to nuke the United States, most major cities? Would nuking Chinese cities bring those people back? Or would it create the destruction of all mankind? Vengence is not worth a billion lives. I would appreciate your thoughts on my question. (It's at the top of the page, please don't give me the "what was the question" lecture) Whether you agree or disagree, please state your reasons, keep it civil, and dont use personal attacks, thank you. If it came down to this, and several US cities have been nuked by a foreign government, my first concern is for the surviving American lives. I would do anything to spare their lives. Come on, let's face it, what is the point of "winning the war" when we're in danger of losing every American life? I'd counterstrike, of course, against military targets. But no nukes, certainly not against civilians. The survival of the biosphere and the human race, as well as American lives are hanging in the balance. I would not launch nukes, ever. Erehwon- Deterrence doesn't work. Other nations are arming for nuclear conflict, and placing more American lives in danger in the process. No, I wouldn't do it if other nations didn't do it as well, but the nuclear standoff is pointless. Someone has to make the first move. Deterrence isn't a deterrence to terrorist states, either. And I still wouldn't nuke Iran, those people are not anti-USA their government is. Point is, civilians don't need to be in fear of nuclear attacks. That's idiotic. Tuugalik- If you seriously believe "nuking our enemies back" will do anything to spare American lives, and will not affect the survival of the human SPECIES, then you my friend are the one that is drunk. Nuclear retaliation does what? What does it do? If it's just there as a BLUFF then why have nuclear material inside? What would nuking the civilian population accomplish? If you don't have reasons for disagreeing, don't bother posting. Miss Manners- What is the point? I didn't say I would lay down and die. I said counterstrike against military targets. And by the way, in the unlikely scenario that the entire world would attempt to nuke us at once, what would be the f---ing point in nuking everyone back? Do you want to see the end of the human race? IF we were unable to stop those missiles from striking us, nothing we do will protect our civilians anyway. So what is the point of hitting back? To cause more innocent people to die? I'd aim for every missile, silo, submarine, aircraft, etc. But I would not aim for civilian people who did nothing to harm the United States. I do thank you for your answer, you did at least state your reasoning. I strongly disagree. I'm more than willing to debate this in a civil fashion, just message me or send an email. Civil comments only, please.
Will advances in technology inevitably lead to the destruction of the earth? One of the reasons our troops are taking such a pounding in Iraq is the technology available to terrorists. It's easy to get effective explosives and electronics to rig detonators (activated by cell phones, radios, etc.) Considering how rapidly technology has progressed (think back 50 years, a blink of time in the life of the planet), isn't it inevitable that more and more powerful and destructive forces will be available to more and more people such that, eventually, that destruction will be used on a global scale?
What is the theme of destruction misunderstanding? I have a question for a report I am doing. It says that one of the themes of Daisy Miller is destruction misunderstanding. Explain how this is evident in the novel you read for your book report. WHAT IS DESTRUCTION MISUNDERSTANDING?!
Why is the destruction of the environment a global issue? My question actually consists of how it affects everyone. Of course, I do understand that we can be deprived of food due to environmental destruction. Are there other complex or uncommon reasons for it to be a global issue? Please explain. If possible, cite source and give an example so I can better understand it. This is open for all. No wrong answers unless its irrelevant. Best answers are by voters.
How important do you consider the issue of environmental destruction? Please cite your religious beliefs in accordance with your views. By environmental destruction, I refer to the prognosis of civilization by researchers that over half of animal and plant species will be extinct by the turn of the century. How do you feel about losing our natural world for the providence of our culture's god, Production (whether it goes by the name of Yahweh, Jesus, Capitalism, Science, Democracy, the Economy, or the like)?
Who stands to Financially benefit from the destruction of ACORN? Who stands to Financially or Organizationally benefit from the destruction of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now? I am asking about the Money Trail. Who stands to Financially or Organizationally benefit from the destruction of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now?
Did Jesus really predict the destruction of the second temple? When you consider the dating of the scriptures you find this places the writing during or after the destruction. If the temple was destroyed in 70AD but the gospels were written between 60AD to 100AD (the range is beyond his death) I tend to suspect that the writers embellished the sayings of Jesus to make it more substantial as a religion. What do you think?
How much did Larry Silverstein stand to gain by the total destruction of the twin towers by terrorist attack? Before the attack were the twin towers doing good business? Did they need any work? Extensive refurbishment maybe? Asbestos removal? How expensive is asbestos removal in two 110 storey buildings? If the towers hadn't completely collapsed to the ground would the insurance payout Larry Silverstein received have been the same? Did he profit greatly from the complete collapse of the twin towers? This goes in the political section as I believe there was huge political influence in the destruction caused that day.
What are the affects of Habitat Destruction? By that I mean, what are the affects of Habitat Destruction? What species of animals die because of this? Where are the most common areas of habitat destruction? I'm doing a 4 page report on habitat destruction, and I need help. I need some information on this. Thanks a lot!
Discuss why the earthquake caused so much destruction in Haiti? I am writing an essay on this subject and I need details. I just need to write a paragraph or two because I am working with a group. Can someone please explain why the earthquake caused so much destruction in Haiti. Also tell the source where you got the information from.
Can someone give me info and pics on animal habitat destruction? I have to do a research paper in my english class for environmental issues. I chose animal habitat destruction. My teacher says I need to look for local problems. Can anyone give me ANY information/pictures containing animal habitat destruction in Arkansas? Also, does anyone think this is a good topic? If not, any other ideas?
How do I get the destruction sphere at the Macalania temple in Final Fantasy X? I need to get the aeon Anima, in order to do that I need to get the hidden treasures in the temples. The treasures are revealed using the destruction spheres. How do I get the destrucion sphere at the Macalania temple? It's the temple where you need to rebuild the bridge after beating Seymour. It's made out of ice and I already know how to rebuild it and everything, but where is the destruction sphere that leads me to the treasure?
Why do we yawn at creation and thrill at destruction? Why is it that we (western society) get bored and 'yawn' at creation, at helping someone down at the shops, at volunteering for civic service (ambulance, State Emergency Service, etc.), at giving of ourselves to help others? But 'thrill' and want more of destruction, at going to a fight, at grabbing for everything we can, at going to the gun range, at religiously watching the news to revel in the misfortunes of others? What is it about us that drives us to self and socially destructive activities and situations? Why is self and socially constructive situation so boring to us? Please explain your answers. Thanks.
Why doesn't anyone blame the economic crisis on the destruction of American jobs? With all the layoffs and destruction of jobs, in addition to high gas prices and a hemorrhage of federal money to the Iraq War, why don't people blame the economic crisis on that, instead of the subprime mortgage companies? If people don't have jobs, they can't pay anything. It's even worse when they're getting extorted by gas prices. You can hide up unemployment with the system they have in place now, but you can't hide people not paying their bills!
Do you play an important role in the destruction of the world? Do you feel that your very being has a role to play in the world's destruction/end of times/or other fateful end? If so, how are you or will you be able to create such destruction and what makes you feel like such a key player in this climactic point in the world's possible history?
What do you think is the cause of the Hinulugang Taktak’s destruction? •Did you know that the Hinulugang Taktak would be this dirty? •Can you please tell us how this place looked like when it was still clean? •Kindly state to us some examples of the bad actions that the tourists or residents did to the falls. •How did the city government respond to this immediate destruction? Hinulugang Taktak (Antipolo City, Philippines) was one of the top tourist destinations before. With its wonderful waters and calm ambience, anyone who seeks peace will be gravitated to this place. But now, it doesn't look peaceful anymore. Garbage is everywhere thus creating an unpleasant smell making the tourists grossed out. Currently, the government is planning to have a convention center established near the place. There are still no concrete actions to restore its former beauty.
Can evil thinking people cause rain and destruction? I heard the story about Sodom and Gomorrah the other day where people where not nice and god called destruction on them. May it also true in our day's that bad talking people call destruction upon them. And what about the other people who have to suffer because there wrong doing.
Why do cities want to host G-20 summits when they know that there will be riots and destruction? At every G20 summit the same thing happens: violent protesters flood the host city and create chaos and destruction. I know that most of the protesters are usually peaceful, but there always is the inevitable violent showdown with a small group of rabble rousers. I don't know, why would cities want to host these summits? The local governments enjoy wasting tax dollars on security and compensation for owners whose businesses were vandalized? Doesn't make sense to me.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers